Search

Shilpa Nanja

Hillsboro, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
15 matches · 4W–11L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.45
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
74%
down to 2.5
26%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 48% down · 52% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.50. Higher than today’s 2.45 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Hillsboro · 3.0
11 of 11
OR · 3.0
599 of 600

Shilpa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams4 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shilpa has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.4% of games
2.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history15 matches
L
2026-07-20 · Hulme · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryann Hulme
+0.007about as expected — took 40% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
Jennifer Yamin / Jennifer Tadjedin
2026-07-06 · Hulme · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandy Mach
0.015about as expected — took 53% of games against 57% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · Hulme · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandy Mach
+0.051better than expected — took 44% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
Amanda Welter / Lillian Lee
2026-05-17 · NOR-THPRD-Corrales · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Chow
+0.028better than expected — took 52% of games against 39% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Grayson Dempsey / Rachel Young
2026-05-10 · NOR-THPRD-Corrales · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandy Mach
+0.001about as expected — took 37% of games against 39% expected
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
Amy Marr / Allison Ferre
2026-03-29 · NOR-THPRD-Corrales · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ying Deng
0.033below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Yiming Hu / Phyllis Shenmixed
2025-11-23 · THPRD-Liu/Corrales · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Yifan Xiang
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 30% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Parsa Taghizadeh / Abby Pacemixed
2025-11-16 · THPRD-Liu/Corrales · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Yifan Xiang
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Eryn Wecker / Bernie Laumixed
2025-11-01 · THPRD-Liu/Corrales · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Yifan Xiang
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Carleen McKillop / Amber Wrightchamps
2025-08-09 · N OR-THPRD-Corrales · #1 Doubles · with Jeanne Liu
+0.078better than expected — took 75% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Anuradha Nandagiri / Maryna Kosauchamps
2025-08-08 · N OR-THPRD-Corrales · #1 Doubles · with Jeanne Liu
+0.020about as expected — took 33% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-06-29 · N OR-THPRD-Corrales · #2 Doubles · with Maggie Ma
+0.038better than expected — took 44% of games against 32% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.