← Search

Alex Jones

Aurora, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 22W–27L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Alex Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
W
2026-07-27 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Mandel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-21 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Mandel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Mandel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Mandel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Mandel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-03 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Mandel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-02 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Mandel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Young championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · Mandel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Mandel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-14 · SHC-Christensen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · SHC-Christensen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · SHC-Christensen · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
14W–14L · 54.2% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 50.7% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 37.4% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#1 Singles
10%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
8%
4 matches
#1 Female Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal