← Search

Lee Rahr

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 24W–17L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lee Rahr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-06-14 · MAC-Leedy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · MAC-Leedy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · MAC-Leedy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · MAC-Leedy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-03-20 · MAC-Leedy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Leedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-14 · MAC-Leedy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-07 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ingeborg Holliday
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-01-31 · MAC-Leedy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-23 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Torch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-11 · MAC-Leedy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Leedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-03 · MAC-Leedy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Leedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-02-09 · MAC-Leedy/Davis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Leedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
65.6%
21W–11L · 56.1% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal