Search

Jennifer Stevenson

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
187 matches · 91W–96L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.45
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 40 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
75%
stay 3.5
25%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.38. Lower than today’s 3.45 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
50 of 399
OR · 3.5
113 of 735

Jennifer is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams52 teams · 2010–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jennifer has gone from the 61st to the 35th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
49.1%
28W–29L · 52.3% of games
3.5
33.3%
16W–32L · 47.6% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 60.3% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 61.8% of games
6.0mixed
60.7%
17W–11L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
50%
13W–13L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history187 matches
W
2026-07-27 · Edwards/Harrington-Serves You Right · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Cofield
+0.024better than expected — took 59% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-18 · MAC-Bourland · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kip Stevenson
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-17 · THPRD-Omlid · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Bayless
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 61% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · Edwards/Harrington-Serves You Right · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Bennett-Hanes
0.025below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #3 Doubles · with Ellen Bowman
+0.044better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #1 Doubles · with Barbara Gram
+0.008about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #1 Doubles · with Ellen Bowman
0.014below expectation — took 47% of games against 55% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #2 Doubles · with Ellen Bowman
+0.028better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-21 · MAC-Bourland · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kip Stevenson
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Mary Murphy / Caroline Hall
2026-06-20 · Edwards/Harrington-Serves You Right · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Bennett-Hanes
+0.054better than expected — took 86% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Omlid · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fenn Bourland
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Tammy Cofield / Angie Cunningham
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Gram
+0.019better than expected — took 44% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.