← Search

Jennifer Stevenson

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
188 matches · 91W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Stevenson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history188 matches
L
2026-07-29 · Edwards/Harrington-Serves You Right · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Bennett-Hanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-27 · Edwards/Harrington-Serves You Right · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Cofield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-18 · MAC-Bourland · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kip Stevenson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-17 · THPRD-Omlid · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Bayless mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · Edwards/Harrington-Serves You Right · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Bennett-Hanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · with Ellen Bowman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Barbara Gram championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Ellen Bowman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Ellen Bowman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-21 · MAC-Bourland · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kip Stevenson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-20 · Edwards/Harrington-Serves You Right · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Bennett-Hanes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Gram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2010–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
49.1%
28W–29L · 52.3% of games
3.5
32.7%
16W–33L · 47.3% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 60.3% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 61.8% of games
6.0mixed
60.7%
17W–11L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
50%
13W–13L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
29 matches
#1 Singles
14%
27 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer