← Search

Kip Stevenson

Portland, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 35W–94L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kip Stevenson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
L
2026-07-18 · MAC-Bourland · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Stevenson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-21 · MAC-Bourland · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Stevenson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-12 · MAC-Caldicott · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marshall Levine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · MAC-Caldicott · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · with Jennifer Stevenson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-24 · NOR-THPRD-Stevenson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Stevenson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-18 · NOR-THPRD-Stevenson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Stevenson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · with Melanie Morris championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-08 · MAC-Stevenson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Soot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-22 · MAC-Stevenson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-29 · THPRD-Stevenson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Michael Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-22 · THPRD-Stevenson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Michael Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
24.4%
11W–34L · 38.5% of games
6.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 40.2% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
35.8%
19W–34L · 43% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
31 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer