Teams

MAC-Stevenson

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Margo Yohner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.10
Jason Trinchero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Jennifer Bayless
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Tracey Forrest
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.95
Melanie Morris
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
David Graham
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.84
Jay Hopson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Troy Pickard
published 3
2.73
Phillip Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Joy Heinecke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.46
Susan Sienko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.26
Kip Stevenson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Margo Yohner
71W–57L career
0%49%51%
3.11
3
Jason Trinchero
30W–15L career
0%53%47%
3.10
3
Jennifer Bayless
61W–13L career
0%76%24%
3.02
3.5
Tracey Forrest
16W–14L career · type A
46%54%0%
2.96
3
Melanie Morris
25W–25L career
0%89%11%
2.95
3
David Graham
46W–35L career
0%89%11%
2.95
3
Jay Hopson
38W–30L career
0%98%2%
2.84
3
Troy Pickard
9W–6L career
not enough data
3
Phillip Jones
3W–5L career · type S
5%94%1%
2.73
3
Joy Heinecke
26W–36L career
7%93%0%
2.65
3
Susan Sienko
28W–77L career · type A
45%55%0%
2.46
2.5
Kip Stevenson
35W–94L career
0%92%8%
2.26

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.