← Search

Dave Sato

Beaverton, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 40W–110L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dave Sato to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-07-31 · SAC-Hummel · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jann Purdy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-25 · SAC-Hummel · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natasha Brady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-17 · SAC-Hummel · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natasha Brady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-11 · SAC-Hummel · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa McConachie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · SAC-Hummel/McConachie · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diana Crawford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-09 · SAC-Hummel/McConachie · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natasha Brady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-03 · SAC-Henkhaus · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jonathan Chun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-01 · SAC-Hummel/McConachie · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natasha Brady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-18 · SAC-Henkhaus · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rodney Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-21 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-14 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mauro Kobrinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-02-28 · SAC-Elmer/Harvey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rodney Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams93 teams · 2004–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
37.9%
22W–36L · 45.7% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 43.9% of games
7.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 31.8% of games
6.0mixed
13.7%
7W–44L · 34.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
40 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King