Search

Natasha Brady

HILLSBORO, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
134 matches · 33W–101L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.49
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 26 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
56%
down to 2.5
44%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 34% down · 66% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.53. Higher than today’s 2.49 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 3.0
592 of 600

Natasha is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams45 teams · 2009–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Natasha has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Natasha has gone from the 2nd to the 4th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 76.2% of games
3.0
15.4%
10W–55L · 35% of games
6.0
20%
2W–8L · 33.5% of games
6.0mixed
27.5%
14W–37L · 38.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history134 matches
L
2026-07-25 · SAC-Hummel · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Sato
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-17 · SAC-Hummel · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Sato
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 26% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Lora Lord / Matthew Thoresonmixed
2026-06-21 · SAC-Hummel · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David-Richard Layzekk
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Molly Albright / Cordelia Tilghman
2026-05-31 · SAC-Smith/Wang · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Freed
0.060below expectation — took 0% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-09 · SAC-Hummel/McConachie · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Sato
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Sonja McIntosh / Vanessa Norris
2026-05-02 · SAC-Smith/Wang · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynda Gordon
+0.011better than expected — took 53% of games against 46% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Tony D. Wang / June Xiaomixed
2026-05-01 · SAC-Hummel/McConachie · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Sato
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-26 · SAC-Smith/Wang · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Wang
0.017below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Andrew Adeboi / Hilary Johnsonmixed
2026-04-18 · SAC-Hummel/McConachie · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rodney Johnson
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Rie Yuasa / Sarah Cariaga
2026-04-18 · SAC-Smith/Wang · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynda Gordon
0.048below expectation — took 8% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-05 · SAC-Hummel/McConachie · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donny Cablao
+0.000about as expected — took 62% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-03-22 · SAC-Hummel/McConachie · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gerald Snell
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.