Search

Thomas Croll

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
58 matches · 30W–28L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.97
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
62%
stay 3.0
38%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 90% stay · 10% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.90. Lower than today’s 2.97 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
95 of 357
OR · 3.0
158 of 600

Thomas is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Thomas has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Thomas has gone from the 55th to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 57.8% of games
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.3% of games
6.0mixed
34.4%
11W–21L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-06-13 · PT&E/SJRC-Bollaert/Bednarz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Floyd
0.010about as expected — took 46% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
Rasesh Joshi / Reno Brown
2026-05-30 · PT&E/SJRC-Simons · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evan Simons
+0.028better than expected — took 65% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Anca Tudorache / Octavian Tudorachemixed
2026-05-24 · PT&E/SJRC-Gay/Diaz de Leon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nadine Hazard
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Hunter Chace / Zachary Casanover
2026-05-24 · PT&E/SJRC-Bollaert/Bednarz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Floyd
+0.011better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-23 · PT&E/SJRC-Gay/Diaz de Leon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Penny Mclain
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-15 · PT&E/SJRC-Gay/Diaz de Leon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nadine Hazard
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Graham Rykiel / Tamarsh Abeysekera
2026-05-10 · PT&E/SJRC-Bollaert/Bednarz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Floyd
+0.016better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Catalin Stoica / John Nguyen
2026-05-02 · PT&E/SJRC-Simons · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas White
+0.063better than expected — took 75% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-02 · PT&E/SJRC-Bollaert/Bednarz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Luke Burke
+0.025better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
George Apostolou / Tyler Grant
2026-04-26 · PT&E/SJRC-Bollaert/Bednarz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Marin
0.022below expectation — took 35% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-26 · PT&E/SJRC-Simons · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Floyd
+0.056better than expected — took 55% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · PT&E/SJRC-Gay/Diaz de Leon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nadine Hazard
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.