← Search

Hunter Chace

Longview, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
55 matches · 21W–34L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.72
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Longview · 3.0
6 of 7
WA · 3.0
671 of 755

Hunter is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Hunter has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Hunter has gone from the 5th to the 36th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 55.8% of games
3.0
27.8%
5W–13L · 41.1% of games
6.0
40%
4W–6L · 41.9% of games
6.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 27.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history55 matches
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Ramshaw
−0.030below expectation — took 41% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Kenny Ristau / Calvin Hsieh
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rowan Seals
+0.039better than expected — took 50% of games against 35% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zachary Casanover
−0.011below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Bj Park / Brentley Boger
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rowan Seals
+0.013better than expected — took 54% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
Adam Bucci / Bennett Anderson
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rowan Seals
+0.053better than expected — took 67% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Thanh Duong
2026-04-25 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.008better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Jones
−0.023below expectation — took 48% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
Matt Savage / Tyler Grant
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wesley Eader
+0.007about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-01 · #1 Male Singles · 6.0
−0.023below expectation — took 55% of games against 63% expected
6-5
W
2026-02-22 · #1 Male Singles · 6.0
+0.018better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-3
W
Cody Bui
2026-02-07 · #1 Male Singles · 6.0
+0.023better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-2
L
Kai Lin / Jeewon Suh
2026-02-01 · #1 Male Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Mitchell
+0.037better than expected — took 33% of games against 26% expected
6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.