Search

Tyler Grant

Ridgefield, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
68 matches · 20W–48L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Ridgefield · 3.0
2 of 5
WA · 3.0
630 of 755

Tyler is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams13 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tyler has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Tyler has gone from the 14th to the 52nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
37.3%
19W–32L · 46.4% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 41.2% of games
7.0
0%
0W–5L · 23.1% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-07-27 · Grant · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Savage
0.021below expectation — took 53% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · Grant · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Savage
0.019below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Matthew Philbrook / Bryan Nester
2026-07-05 · Grant · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Savage
0.069below expectation — took 38% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
Todd Shupp / Kenny Ristau
2026-06-14 · Grant · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Savage
0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · VTC-Grant(s) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Khaden Jee
0.012below expectation — took 42% of games against 48% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · VTC-Savage · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Thorburn
+0.026better than expected — took 39% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · VTC-Grant(s) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Grant
+0.094better than expected — took 100% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Nick Hamilton / Scott Dickinson
2026-06-07 · VTC-Savage · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Savage
+0.062better than expected — took 56% of games against 31% expected
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Daniel Ellis / Stefano Gaggini
2026-06-06 · VTC-Grant(s) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Savage
+0.019better than expected — took 48% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Richard Anderson / Kai Zhang
2026-05-10 · VTC-Savage · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Ho
+0.075better than expected — took 52% of games against 24% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · VTC-Grant(s) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Savage
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · VTC-Grant(s) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with George Apostolou
+0.022better than expected — took 65% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.