← Search

Tyler Grant

Ridgefield, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 20W–51L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Tyler Grant to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-08-07 · Grant · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · Grant · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-5
L
2026-07-31 · Grant · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-27 · Grant · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · Grant · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-05 · Grant · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-14 · Grant · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · VTC-Savage · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Thorburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · VTC-Grant(s) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Khaden Jee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · VTC-Grant(s) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-07 · VTC-Savage · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
Daniel Ellis / Stefano Gaggini
2026-06-06 · VTC-Grant(s) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
35.2%
19W–35L · 45.7% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 41.2% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.1% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 23.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#1 Male Doubles
7%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King