Search

Todd Shupp

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
49 matches · 28W–21L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.86
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
95%
stay 3.0
5%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.82. Lower than today’s 2.86 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
159 of 357
OR · 3.0
270 of 600

Todd is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams12 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Todd has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Todd has gone from the 28th to the 76th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 60% of games
3.0
58.6%
17W–12L · 52% of games
6.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-07-26 · GLVR-Shupp/Jenkins · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Lanceta
+0.000about as expected — took 43% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Shannon Wagner / Daniel Ellismixed
2026-07-25 · GLVR-Shupp/Jenkins · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Lanceta
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-07 · Deuce Bags · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenny Ristau
+0.030better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Tyler Grant / Matt Savage
2026-06-14 · Deuce Bags · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenny Ristau
+0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Skylar Soon / Frank Wong - (DQ)*
2026-06-13 · Deuce Bags · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Calvin Hsieh
0.037below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
JAMES KYUNG / Ned Cannon
2026-05-24 · CRRC-Golovchenko/Stowell · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenny Ristau
+0.039better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Joseph M Heffernan III / Michael Parkhurst
2026-05-10 · CRRC-Golovchenko/Stowell · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Hutson
0.019below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Travis Hendricks / Adarsh Bhardwaj
2026-05-03 · CRRC-Golovchenko/Stowell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenny Ristau
+0.025better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Terry Bennett / Ryan Fitzgerald
2026-04-12 · CRRC-Golovchenko/Stowell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexander Abrazaldo
+0.043better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-29 · CRRC-Golovchenko/Stowell · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Calvin Hsieh
+0.005about as expected — took 56% of games against 53% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · GLVR-Shupp/Wilson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carlos Vences
+0.003about as expected — took 62% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-07 · GLVR-Shupp/Wilson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Oh
+0.061better than expected — took 86% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.