Search

Tate Kuerbis

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
95 matches · 55W–40L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.98
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 31 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
59%
stay 3.0
41%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 89% stay · 11% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.90. Lower than today’s 2.98 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
90 of 357
OR · 3.0
149 of 600

Tate is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams19 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tate has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Tate has gone from the 56th to the 84th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
62.7%
32W–19L · 56.3% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
58.3%
14W–10L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history95 matches
W
2026-07-23 · Tres Volley Shots · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joshua Lewis
+0.022better than expected — took 86% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Chris Burke
2026-07-21 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.006about as expected — took 40% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 5-3
W
Matthew Philbrook / Bryan Nester
2026-07-20 · Tres Volley Shots · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joshua Lewis
+0.002better than expected — took 75% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · IRV-Koppelman/Kuerbis · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Cooke
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Joseph Pham / Anthony Hoang
2026-07-17 · Tres Volley Shots · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jared Rollier
+0.038better than expected — took 65% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Chiqu Li / Jiafang Liuchamps
2026-07-11 · NOR-IRV-Lewis · #3 Doubles · with Sarah Sasek
0.044below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Jillian Mcqueen / Scott Foxchamps
2026-07-10 · NOR-IRV-Lewis · #2 Doubles · with Sarah Sasek
+0.031better than expected — took 62% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · Tres Volley Shots · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jared Rollier
0.006about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Calvin Hsieh / Erik Wilson
2026-06-29 · Tres Volley Shots · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jared Rollier
0.010about as expected — took 68% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-27 · IRV-Koppelman/Kuerbis · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Cooke
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Shriram Shivaraman / Vivek Raghuvanshichamps
2026-06-21 · NOR-IRV-Lewis · #2 Doubles · with Jared Rollier
0.020below expectation — took 41% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Danny Peter / Joseph M Heffernan IIIchamps
2026-06-20 · NOR-IRV-Lewis · #1 Doubles · with Bryan Potter
0.029below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.