← Search

Preston Wallace

Olympia, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
78 matches · 31W–47L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Olympia · 3.0
35 of 41
WA · 3.0
603 of 755

Preston is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Preston has been a steady 3.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

2.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Preston has gone from the 52nd to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
43.3%
29W–38L · 46.9% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 38% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history78 matches
L
Chad Adams
2026-05-13 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Cedric Bella / Craig Fulkerson
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anderson Durham
+0.029better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicholas Beatty
+0.011about as expected — took 42% of games against 39% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Mike Doherty / David Smith
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jonathan Fischer
+0.028better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joey Depinto
−0.033below expectation — took 37% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
David Smith / David Nemetz
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dan Crowell
+0.106better than expected — took 80% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Craig Fulkerson / Paul Sheehan
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anderson Durham
+0.000better than expected — took 72% of games against 66% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-03-05 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.045below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-02 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.038better than expected — took 59% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anderson Durham
−0.020below expectation — took 47% of games against 55% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anderson Durham
+0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.016below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.