← Search

Rex Schade

Olympia, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 37W–35L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Rex Schade to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
2026-09-13 · VAC-Clerget · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-26 · Rex Schade · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-05 · VAC-Casebier · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Stormans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-28 · VAC-Casebier · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Stormans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-14 · VAC-Casebier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Lindberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-08 · VAC-Casebier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-01 · VAC-Casebier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-26 · Schade · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victor Andrade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-10 · Schade · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-03-05 · Schade · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-02 · Schade · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-02-23 · Schade · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victor Andrade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–4L · 44.2% of games
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.8% of games
4.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 51.8% of games
7.0
53.1%
17W–15L · 50.8% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#1 Singles
17%
12 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams