← Search

John Lindberg

Olympia, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
146 matches · 64W–82L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add John Lindberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history146 matches
W
2026-09-13 · VAC-Clerget · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Thomas Henderson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · LRC-Huffman · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Clemente Villalobos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-13 · LRC-Huffman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Maciejewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-11 · LRC-Huffman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Laskowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · LRC-Huffman · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-28 · VAC-Casebier · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-22 · VAC-Casebier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-14 · VAC-Casebier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rex Schade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-11 · LRC-Huffman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Beresky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-08 · VAC-Casebier · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-17 · VAC-Casebier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams94 teams · 2006–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 54.7% of games
4.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 33.2% of games
7.0
57.6%
34W–25L · 56.5% of games
8.0
21.7%
5W–18L · 33.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
44 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer