← Search

Jeff Laskowski

Gig Harbor, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 28W–81L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeff Laskowski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
L
2026-06-13 · LRC-Huffman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-13 · LRC-Huffman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Beresky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · LRC-Wright · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Dewald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · LRC-Huffman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Lindberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · LRC-Huffman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Peyton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-28 · LRC-Wright · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Whittaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-14 · LRC-Wright · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pete Addison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-04-30 · LRC-Wright · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-04-17 · LRC-Wright · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Fynboe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-07 · LRC-Triquart/Toline · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Triquart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-02-07 · LRC-Triquart/Toline · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JOHN COSTANTI
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Terry Pawlitschek / Winferd Baker
2026-01-10 · LRC-Triquart/Toline · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Rettke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
26.9%
14W–38L · 38.8% of games
7.0
25.6%
11W–32L · 42.6% of games
8.0
0%
0W–6L · 26.3% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
30 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert