Search

Dana Nojima

Olympia, WA
3.0A year-end 2025
52 matches · 23W–29L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Olympia · 3.0
34 of 41
WA · 3.0
584 of 755

Dana is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dana has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Dana has gone from the 48th to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 41.2% of games
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 70% of games
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 65.7% of games
7.0
48%
12W–13L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Stockwill
+0.009about as expected — took 25% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Stockwill
+0.010about as expected — took 42% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Hanson
+0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 26% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Phillips
+0.005about as expected — took 45% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steven Morta
0.015below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Michael Harn / Timothy Gebuhr
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randy Holmer
0.029below expectation — took 35% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert Peters
+0.004about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Nathan Rettke / Aaron Smith
2026-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randy Holmer
+0.038better than expected — took 62% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-12-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roy Seeman
0.003about as expected — took 57% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Smith
+0.016better than expected — took 52% of games against 46% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Henderson
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rex Schade
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.