← Search

Roy Seeman

Olympia, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 95W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Roy Seeman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
W
Paul Garry / Hector M Salomon
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Leonard Bauer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with James Phillips championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
Mark Alderson / David Smith
2026-03-01 · GTC-Doane 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leonard Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-02-07 · GTC-Doane 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cedric Canton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
David White / Graeme Chapman
2026-01-03 · GTC-Doane 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-06 · SWW-VAC-Clerget · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Nojima
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-12-06 · SWW-VAC-Engle · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cullen Stephenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-08 · SWW-VAC-Clerget · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Holmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
N/A
2025-11-02 · SWW-VAC-Engle · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Engle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-11-01 · SWW-VAC-Clerget · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Holmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-08-23 · #3 Doubles · with Nak Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-08-23 · #1 Doubles · with Oliver Vicente championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2016–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
78.8%
26W–7L · 64.3% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 31.9% of games
7.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 61% of games
8.0
80%
8W–2L · 68.9% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
72%
18W–7L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
34 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King