← Search

Mark Alderson

Bainbridge Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 78W–42L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Mark Alderson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
W
2026-09-12 · KTAC-Johnston · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · SWW-KTAC-Badar · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Fatima Wallin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · SWW-KTAC-Badar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susanne Neupauer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-05 · SWW-KTAC-Badar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susanne Neupauer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-27 · SWW-KTAC-Badar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adrienne Crowley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · SWW-KTAC-Badar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hana Farr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · SWW-KTAC-Badar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hana Farr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · SWW-KTAC-Badar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lindsey Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
Winferd Baker / McKee Buxton
2026-03-15 · KTAC-Ahlstrom · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Lieuw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · KTAC-Ahlstrom · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-22 · KTAC-Ahlstrom · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Ahlstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-01-31 · KTAC-Ahlstrom · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
50%
8W–8L · 47.5% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 49.5% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
60%
21W–14L · 54.1% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
73.8%
31W–11L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams