← Search

Gaylord Escalona

Sammamish, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
202 matches · 131W–71L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Gaylord Escalona to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history202 matches
L
2026-09-12 · PL-18+40=OLD-LaMoria · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Wate mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-11 · PL-Tiedeman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-01 · PL-LaMoria · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Wate mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-26 · PL-Escalona M55 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terri Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Michael Axtman / Cynthia Axtman
2026-07-25 · PL-LaMoria · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Wate mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-18 · PL-Escalona M55 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terri Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · PL-Escalona M55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Welch Coulter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · PL-Escalona M55 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mia Koida mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-12-07 · #3 Doubles · with Chris Sbarbaro championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-12-06 · #3 Doubles · with Chris Sbarbaro championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-16 · PL-Tiedeman 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul McBride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-15 · PL-Tiedeman 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Srish Sawkar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
80.3%
49W–12L · 61.5% of games
4.0
52.8%
19W–17L · 51.3% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 57% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 31.9% of games
7.0mixed
69%
29W–13L · 54.6% of games
8.0mixed
53.3%
16W–14L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
47 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Male Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer