← Search

Susanne Neupauer

Bainbridge Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
272 matches · 127W–145L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Susanne Neupauer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history272 matches
L
2026-09-12 · BAIN-Colegrove · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adrienne Crowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-01 · BAIN-Neupauer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Crowley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · BAIN-Neupauer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Alderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · BAIN-Neupauer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brendan Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-05 · BAIN-Neupauer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Alderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-27 · BAIN-Neupauer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brendan Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · BAIN-Neupauer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brendan Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · BAIN-Neupauer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brendan Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-27 · BAIN-Neupauer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Queen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-21 · BAIN-Neupauer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Frazee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-14 · BAIN-Neupauer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Queen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-02-07 · BAIN-Neupauer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fatima Wallin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
52%
51W–47L · 52.4% of games
4.5
29.7%
11W–26L · 43.5% of games
8.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 48.1% of games
9.0
20%
1W–4L · 41.2% of games
8.0mixed
52.5%
42W–38L · 50.7% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
93 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
52 matches
#1 Singles
18%
50 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams