← Search

Robin Freedman

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 55W–63L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Robin Freedman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
W
2026-08-12 · Robin · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-1
L
2026-08-09 · TCSP-Mixed Drinks-Blum · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Howard Choder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · TCSP-Macduff · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rick Eberhardt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · TCSP-Macduff · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dan Eder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · Waltz - Freedman (Flexible) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Waltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-22 · Waltz - Freedman (Flexible) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Waltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · TCSP-Macduff · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Lindburg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-10 · Waltz - Freedman (Flexible) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Waltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-05 · TCSP-Macduff · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Steinwinder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-05 · Waltz - Freedman (Flexible) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Waltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-03 · Waltz - Freedman (Flexible) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Waltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-28 · TCSP-Macduff · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Steinwinder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2002–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
51.5%
17W–16L · 51.7% of games
4.0
37.1%
13W–22L · 47.2% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 54.3% of games
8.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
14 matches
#2 Singles
9%
11 matches
#1 Female Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer