← Search

Chutimont Blacksmith

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
209 matches · 144W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.88
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
94%
down to 4.0
6%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 74% down · 26% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.95. Higher than today’s 3.88 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.5
93 of 103
WA · 4.5
336 of 364

Chutimont is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chutimont has played at 3.0, 4.0, 4.5 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.04.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Chutimont has gone from the 40th to the 75th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level10 levels played
3.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 62.5% of games
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.6% of games
4.0
58.1%
25W–18L · 54.8% of games
4.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 42.7% of games
8.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 66.4% of games
9.0
40%
2W–3L · 49% of games
6.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
87%
20W–3L · 61.3% of games
8.0mixed
50%
13W–13L · 54.4% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history209 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Howard Shalinsky
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joel Bodine
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Amy Holmes / Matthew Allenmixed
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Scott Charlston
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dean Ciano
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Mandi Counter
−0.029below expectation — took 50% of games against 62% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ra'Id Khalil
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Lisa Debiec / Amy Hsu
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Suzanne Eichenlaub
−0.044below expectation — took 33% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Kylie Choi / Laurie Ono
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Fletcher
−0.022below expectation — took 37% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Barrett
−0.054below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kylea Gleason
−0.018below expectation — took 38% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathy Tousley
+0.009about as expected — took 40% of games against 38% expected
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-03-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Welsh
+0.028better than expected — took 52% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 5-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.