← Search

Dean Ciano

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
85 matches · 58W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.33
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
113 of 256
WA · 3.5
481 of 1209

Dean is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dean has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Dean has gone from the 63rd to the 76th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
68.9%
42W–19L · 53.9% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 55.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kirsten Graham
+0.000below expectation — took 45% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ge Li
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chutimont Blacksmith
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kirsten Graham
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 61% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Douglas Beck / Karen Kellymixed
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ge Li
+0.000below expectation — took 53% of games against 62% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Kaz Kitagaito / Vivek Devi
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Milton Smith
+0.073better than expected — took 100% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Jerico Factor / Phillip Pham
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Troop
+0.009better than expected — took 61% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Drake Brodahl / Christopher Glassmoyer
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexander Ung
+0.018better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Mike Kean / James Kestner
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Troop
−0.022below expectation — took 32% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexander Ung
−0.007about as expected — took 39% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Minas Ter-Galstyan / Sean McCarron
2026-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hung Nguyen
+0.003about as expected — took 62% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-01-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abraham Lee
−0.050below expectation — took 50% of games against 69% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.