Search

Cheryl Farnham

Tacoma, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
238 matches · 76W–162L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.83
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
98%
stay 4.0
2%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Tacoma · 4.0
4 of 22
WA · 4.0
114 of 782

Cheryl is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams107 teams · 2003–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cheryl has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Cheryl has gone from the 4th to the 1st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
4.0
52.8%
19W–17L · 52.1% of games
4.5
18.2%
14W–63L · 39.3% of games
8.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 58.5% of games
9.0
18.5%
5W–22L · 39.5% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
37.5%
9W–15L · 48.3% of games
9.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history238 matches
W
2026-07-18 · BAIN-Neupauer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Sullivan
+0.000below expectation — took 52% of games against 69% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Megan Miller / Esther Kim
2026-07-14 · Farnham/Lorrain · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Swets
0.014below expectation — took 45% of games against 51% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-05 · BAIN-Neupauer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Sullivan
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-01 · Farnham/Lorrain · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kay Lorrain
0.054below expectation — took 14% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-27 · SWW-GTC-Farnham · #1 Doubles · with Tenley Cederstrand
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Anette Pedersen / Petra Carlchamps
2026-06-27 · SWW-GTC-Farnham · #3 Doubles · with Tenley Cederstrand
+0.009about as expected — took 44% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-06-26 · SWW-GTC-Farnham · #2 Doubles · with Tenley Cederstrand
+0.002below expectation — took 14% of games against 26% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Megan Miller / Kristin Gallagher
2026-06-14 · Farnham/Lorrain · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kay Lorrain
0.027below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-03-15 · GTC-Farnham/Yara · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Terra Yara
0.019below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-02-07 · GTC-Farnham/Yara · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hana Farr
+0.019better than expected — took 44% of games against 38% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-25 · GTC-Farnham/Yara · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hana Farr
+0.017about as expected — took 29% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-01-10 · GTC-Farnham/Yara · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kay Lorrain
0.045below expectation — took 8% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.