Search

Julie Swets

SEATTLE, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
80 matches · 58W–22L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
18%
down to 4.0
82%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 11% down · 89% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.10. Higher than today’s 4.07 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
SEATTLE · 4.5
3 of 5
WA · 4.5
204 of 364

Julie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julie has been a steady 4.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

4.04.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Julie has gone from the 52nd to the 75th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
93.8%
15W–1L · 62.5% of games
4.5
60.7%
17W–11L · 53.7% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.4% of games
9.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history80 matches
L
Megan Miller / Esther Kim
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cheryl Farnham
0.014below expectation — took 45% of games against 51% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Alana Wade / Belle Dennis
2026-07-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tenley Cederstrand
+0.030better than expected — took 43% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Liz Perlmanchamps
2026-06-21 · #2 Singles
0.054below expectation — took 14% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-07 · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.010better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Connie Cai
0.007about as expected — took 62% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-03 · #2 Singles · 4.5
0.043below expectation — took 53% of games against 66% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Connie Cai
+0.027better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-11-16 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ben Andrews
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 66% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-11-09 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ajay Qi
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Evan Liu / Candice Canleymixed
2025-10-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ben Andrews
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Kate Oost / Cooper Andersonmixed
2025-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kojiro Narita
+0.000below expectation — took 46% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Shannon Nelson / Tia Leemixed
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ajay Qi
+0.000below expectation — took 44% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.