← Search

Scott Griff

Bellevue, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 92W–126L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Scott Griff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history218 matches
L
2026-09-12 · EDG-Win-Ng · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Hubbard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · AYTC-Sidbury's Gang-Sherr · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sue Matyas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · BC-Lopez/Kaptik · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melissa Kaptik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · AYTC-Sidbury's Gang-Sherr · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristin Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · BC-Lopez/Kaptik · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Adkisson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-05 · AYTC-Sidbury's Gang-Sherr · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristin Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · AYTC-Sidbury's Gang-Sherr · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristin Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · AYTC-Sidbury's Gang-Sherr · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristin Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · BC-Park · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · BC-Chen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Griffen Eley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-23 · BC-Park · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Andres Armenta
2026-05-18 · BC-Park · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
44.3%
35W–44L · 49.9% of games
4.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 44.7% of games
8.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 51.6% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 42.6% of games
8.0mixed
45.8%
33W–39L · 48.5% of games
9.0mixed
21.7%
5W–18L · 37.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
72 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
51 matches
#1 Singles
12%
25 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert