← Search

Lisa Mckenny

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
188 matches · 111W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Mckenny to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history188 matches
L
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Sara Addicott championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-26 · AYTC-Body Shots-Steinwinder · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian MacDuff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · TCSP-Macduff · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rick Eberhardt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-21 · Summer Swingers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Kobata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Summer Swingers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Kobata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · AYTC-Body Shots-Steinwinder · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vasu Reddy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Summer Swingers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Addicott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · Summer Swingers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Addicott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · with Kim Kobata championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Kim Kobata championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Sara Addicott championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Kim Kobata championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
69.8%
37W–16L · 57% of games
4.5
32.5%
13W–27L · 43.4% of games
8.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 65.4% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60%
24W–16L · 51.5% of games
9.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
47 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert