Search

EJ Blanchfield

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
128 matches · 72W–56L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.34
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
102 of 256
WA · 3.5
441 of 1209

EJ is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

EJ has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, EJ has gone from the 37th to the 11th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
16W–0L · 70.4% of games
3.5
58.3%
28W–20L · 55.7% of games
4.0
28.1%
9W–23L · 41.4% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 72.2% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history128 matches
L
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Kosloff
+0.012about as expected — took 45% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah McKinney
0.018below expectation — took 8% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aime Mitchell
+0.048better than expected — took 63% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Seifred
+0.003about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aime Mitchell
0.011about as expected — took 46% of games against 50% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aime Mitchell
0.017below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Dinah Satterwhite / Maggie Miller
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aime Mitchell
+0.010about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aime Mitchell
0.028below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah McKinney
+0.030better than expected — took 37% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsea Schanno
+0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsea Schanno
+0.016about as expected — took 29% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Esther Kim / Winly Tang
2025-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clare Mcreynolds
0.028below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.