← Search

Dinah Satterwhite

Bainbridge Is, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
125 matches · 67W–58L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.63
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
5%
down to 3.5
95%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.0
503 of 782

Dinah is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dinah has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Dinah has gone from the 62nd to the 68th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
60%
39W–26L · 54% of games
4.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 41.3% of games
8.0
59.4%
19W–13L · 54% of games
9.0
25%
2W–6L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history125 matches
W
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annie Graebner
+0.001about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fatima Wallin
+0.042better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Miller
−0.009about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Queen
−0.002about as expected — took 60% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 5-3
W
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hana Farr
−0.019about as expected — took 59% of games against 64% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Bast
−0.027below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Fatima Wallin
+0.014better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adrienne Crowley
−0.046below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Frazee
−0.060below expectation — took 25% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-09-20 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kerrie Houston Reightley
−0.021below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Elaine Kelley / Gail Searschamps
2025-09-13 · #1 Doubles · with Kerrie Houston Reightley
−0.001about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-09-12 · #2 Doubles · with Kerrie Houston Reightley
+0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.