Search

Jean Bryant

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
67 matches · 33W–34L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.33
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
107 of 256
WA · 3.5
456 of 1209

Jean is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jean has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920212022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Jean has gone from the 52nd to the 63rd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
61.5%
16W–10L · 52.7% of games
7.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 50.3% of games
8.0
30%
3W–7L · 37.1% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 49.6% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 33.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history67 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rob Vander Stoep
+0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Kristin Peters / Thomas Stanleymixed
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Howard Choder
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Mary Battison / Julie Blume
2026-02-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Thompson
0.027below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Jennifer Chen / Laura Karassik
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherri Johnson
0.008about as expected — took 71% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Doreen Kiss / Naomi Knight
2025-11-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam MacDuff
0.046below expectation — took 37% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Thoren
0.024below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Michelle Watson / Gina Gentry
2025-11-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam MacDuff
0.008below expectation — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pam MacDuff
0.013below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam MacDuff
+0.040better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-10-12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pam MacDuff
0.035below expectation — took 8% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-10-10 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pam MacDuff
0.033below expectation — took 8% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pam MacDuff
+0.057better than expected — took 67% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.