← Search

Jamie Carr

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 53W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jamie Carr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-05-29 · TCSP-Bursiek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-15 · TCSP-Bursiek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Cornwall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-01 · TCSP-Bursiek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Kraus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-17 · TCSP-Bursiek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Kolenski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-04-10 · TCSP-Bursiek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Kraus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-14 · NTC-Hits Different-Bursiek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Fliflet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
Sarah Cole / Paige Gay
2026-03-06 · #2 Doubles · with Carly Baker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Sara Bogado / Corazon Bellamy
2026-03-05 · #2 Doubles · with Carly Baker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-07 · NTC-Hits Different-Bursiek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Cornwall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-01-31 · NTC-Hits Different-Bursiek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Kraus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · NTC-Hits Different-Bursiek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Janson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-14 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole Janson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 57.4% of games
3.5
72%
18W–7L · 58.2% of games
4.0
43.5%
10W–13L · 50.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe