Search

Pamela Kraus

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
160 matches · 88W–72L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.60
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
11%
down to 3.5
89%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.62. Higher than today’s 3.60 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
128 of 186
WA · 4.0
565 of 782

Pamela is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Pamela has been a steady 4.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.54.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Pamela has gone from the 43rd to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 67.8% of games
4.0
41%
32W–46L · 46.2% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 69.3% of games
8.0
62.5%
15W–9L · 55.2% of games
9.0
40%
2W–3L · 41.3% of games
8.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history160 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ra'Id Khalil
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
John Walker / Jackie Oslandmixed
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Tjoa
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Cheryl Hartman / Jameson Lyon
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Matyas
0.014below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Bursiek
0.005about as expected — took 46% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Carr
0.008below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Carr
+0.009about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christa Glenn
+0.015better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Broadwin
0.003below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Carr
+0.043better than expected — took 52% of games against 37% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christa Glenn
+0.033better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Welsh
+0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-11-21 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Dillon
0.005below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.