← Search

Jackie Osland

Bainbridge Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
174 matches · 107W–67L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jackie Osland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history174 matches
L
2026-09-12 · BAIN-Colegrove · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amanda Bast
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-18 · BAIN-Neupauer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Alaniz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-05 · BAIN-Neupauer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Walker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · BAIN-Neupauer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Sullivan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-01 · BAIN-Wiggins · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyra Heatherington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-30 · BAIN-Wiggins · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Bast
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-14 · BAIN-Miner · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Bast
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · BAIN-Miner · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Bast
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-02-01 · BAIN-Miner · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eleanor Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-01-31 · BAIN-Miner · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Bast
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-01-24 · BAIN-Miner · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Bast
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-01-18 · BAIN-Miner · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Bast
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
61.7%
37W–23L · 54.6% of games
4.0
38.7%
12W–19L · 46.3% of games
6.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 69.3% of games
7.0
75%
15W–5L · 52.2% of games
8.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 56.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
71 matches
#1 Singles
21%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
27 matches
#2 Singles
6%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe