Search

Cindy Coakley

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
112 matches · 40W–72L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.01
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
46%
stay 3.0
54%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 83% stay · 17% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.92. Lower than today’s 3.01 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
21 of 63
WA · 3.0
230 of 755

Cindy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cindy has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Cindy has gone from the 42nd to the 11th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
27.9%
17W–44L · 43.1% of games
6.0
80%
4W–1L · 56.3% of games
7.0
40%
16W–24L · 44.9% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history112 matches
W
N/Amixed
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thane Liffick
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Vera Choi / Clellie Dobbsmixed
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Kocher
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricie Hunter
0.001below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandra Rice
0.033below expectation — took 32% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ingrid Sarapuu
0.054below expectation — took 25% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ingrid Sarapuu
0.022below expectation — took 35% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandra Rice
0.020below expectation — took 54% of games against 62% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Laura Tran / Pera Tran
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Gerard
+0.046better than expected — took 60% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Chandra Pandey / Mary Jean Waite
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Smallwood
0.019below expectation — took 45% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandra Rice
+0.039better than expected — took 72% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Sally Linebarger / Karen Larson
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Betsy Chamberlin
+0.036better than expected — took 68% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
Susan Cross / Sonya Teele
2026-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandra Rice
+0.024better than expected — took 57% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.