← Search

Cindy Coakley

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 40W–74L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Cindy Coakley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-09-13 · BC-Vintage-Webber Meeks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Lin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-01 · BC-Happy Love All-Park · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-18 · BC-Happy Love All-Park · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thane Liffick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-12 · BC-Happy Love All-Park · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Kocher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · BC-Happy Spicy-Park · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricie Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-22 · BC-Walker · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandra Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-21 · NWW-BC-Rice · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ingrid Sarapuu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · NWW-BC-Rice · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ingrid Sarapuu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-12 · BC-Walker · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandra Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-10 · BC-Happy Spicy-Park · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Gerard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-09 · BC-Happy Spicy-Park · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Smallwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-30 · BC-Walker · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandra Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
27.9%
17W–44L · 43.1% of games
6.0
80%
4W–1L · 56.3% of games
7.0
39%
16W–25L · 44.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal