Search

Kristin Bibbs

Everett, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
130 matches · 75W–55L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.95
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
75%
stay 3.0
25%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.88. Lower than today’s 2.95 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Everett · 3.0
6 of 9
WA · 3.0
347 of 755

Kristin is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kristin has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020212022202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Kristin has gone from the 53rd to the 74th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
69.8%
44W–19L · 59.8% of games
6.0mixed
52%
13W–12L · 54% of games
7.0mixed
53.3%
16W–14L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Bibbs
+0.000below expectation — took 39% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
Lynsey Liu / Saung Mundt
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Coley
+0.018better than expected — took 55% of games against 45% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Bibbs
+0.000better than expected — took 42% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Bibbs
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Julia Roast / Elise Zabel
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Coley
0.021below expectation — took 32% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Laura Borner / Jan Stroh
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Coley
0.019below expectation — took 52% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
Aaron Young / Rachel Youngmixed
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Soma Burela
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 54% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Jiayi Lin / Xiaozhen Liu
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Coley
0.010about as expected — took 63% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Felicia Ng / Lily Ng
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Coley
0.009about as expected — took 57% of games against 60% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Mara White / Sarah Huang
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colleen Tracy
0.014below expectation — took 41% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Pallavi Taleppadi / Danielle Adams
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Coley
+0.001better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Kacie Stovall / Kaitlynn Hall
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Coley
0.063below expectation — took 41% of games against 65% expected
7-6, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.