Search

Caleb Blum

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
137 matches · 56W–81L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.10
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
10%
down to 3.0
90%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.12. Higher than today’s 3.10 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
238 of 256
WA · 3.5
1092 of 1209

Caleb is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Caleb has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Caleb has gone from the 20th to the 44th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 48% of games
4.0
44.4%
20W–25L · 47.5% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.8% of games
8.0
20%
1W–4L · 44.2% of games
7.0mixed
45.2%
14W–17L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history137 matches
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Korch
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam MacDuff
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Draper
0.066below expectation — took 14% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Peter Mason / Paul Zemtzov
2025-10-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rob Vander Stoep
0.032below expectation — took 38% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
William Manson / Jon Woodbrook
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Fuller
+0.013better than expected — took 60% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Henry Kiner / Jonathan Weinstein
2025-09-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rob Vander Stoep
0.031below expectation — took 38% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Bryant
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Bryant
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-04-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Tjoa
0.040below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Tjoa
0.063below expectation — took 0% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2025-02-16 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.023better than expected — took 100% of games against 91% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Michael Dix / Matthew Scher
2025-01-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shai Harmelin
+0.002about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.