← Search

Kathy Yang-Williams

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 38W–45L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Kathy Yang-Williams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-09-11 · TCSP-Women of Wow-Morris · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Molly Bullard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-09 · TCSP-Mixed Drinks-Blum · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rob Vander Stoep mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · TCSP-Mixed Drinks-Blum · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caleb Blum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · TCSP-Mixed Drinks-Blum · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian MacDuff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-19 · TCSP-Mixed Drinks-Blum · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian MacDuff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-30 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Connolly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elise Spencer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-09 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Connolly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-29 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Bullard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-13 · NTC-Team Z-Zimbelman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-01 · NTC-Team Z-Zimbelman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
42.9%
24W–32L · 45.4% of games
3.5
50%
4W–4L · 49.3% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 71.9% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42.9% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
18 matches
#2 Singles
8%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova