Search

Sheila Connolly

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
138 matches · 66W–72L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.82
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
111 of 144
WA · 3.0
551 of 755

Sheila is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sheila has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Sheila has gone from the 58th to the 15th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
54.4%
43W–36L · 50.9% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 40.4% of games
6.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.6% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 59.5% of games
7.0mixed
23.8%
5W–16L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history138 matches
L
Sarah Smith / Christa Lum
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Morris
0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Anca Zaharia / Ellen Owen
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Yang-Williams
0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Yang-Williams
+0.001about as expected — took 45% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Chunchun Tong / Yuchen Zhang
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Wilson
0.066below expectation — took 8% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Kelly Ambrose / Rachel Malen
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elise Spencer
0.009about as expected — took 44% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Katherine Matias / Sheila Loekito
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Morris
+0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
0.013below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-02-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liesl Langley
0.032below expectation — took 38% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-02-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Hagan
0.022below expectation — took 48% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Geanina Andreiu / Jennifer Jensen
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Hagan
0.009about as expected — took 63% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Chris Stewart / Diane Koch
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Molly Bullard
0.040below expectation — took 50% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Barbara Selemon / Lori Estes
2025-11-01 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wendy Champagne
+0.015better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.