← Search

Sheila Connolly

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 66W–73L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Sheila Connolly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
L
2026-09-11 · TCSP-Women of Wow-Morris · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carrie Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Yang-Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Yang-Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-18 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elise Spencer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · TCSP-Sharks-Tarte · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-13 · TCSP-Sharks-Tarte · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liesl Langley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-08 · TCSP-Sharks-Tarte · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Hagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · TCSP-Sharks-Tarte · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Hagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-11-15 · TCSP-Women of Wham-Eleveld · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Molly Bullard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
54.4%
43W–36L · 50.9% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 40.4% of games
6.0
60%
6W–4L · 56% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 59.5% of games
7.0mixed
23.8%
5W–16L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
35 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova