← Search

Liesl Langley

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 46W–66L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Liesl Langley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
L
2026-07-20 · Miss Hits · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Galen Sherlock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · TCSP-Holland · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-28 · TCSP-Holland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allie Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-22 · TCSP-Holland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allie Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · TCSP-Holland · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-5
L
2026-05-14 · TCSP-Holland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Spencer-Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-09 · TCSP-Holland · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hanseler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-03 · TCSP-Holland · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-26 · TCSP-Holland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Spencer-Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-13 · TCSP-Sharks-Tarte · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Connolly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-08 · TCSP-Sharks-Tarte · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-24 · TCSP-Sharks-Tarte · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
43.6%
34W–44L · 47.4% of games
3.5
20%
4W–16L · 39.4% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
26 matches
#1 Singles
11%
12 matches
#2 Singles
10%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova