← Search

Liesl Langley

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
112 matches · 46W–66L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.91
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
87%
stay 3.0
13%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.85. Lower than today’s 2.91 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
92 of 144
WA · 3.0
412 of 755

Liesl is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Liesl has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Liesl has gone from the 13th to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
43.6%
34W–44L · 47.4% of games
3.5
20%
4W–16L · 39.4% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history112 matches
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Galen Sherlock
+0.009about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-04 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.004below expectation — took 0% of games against 15% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allie Wood
+0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 26% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Wendy Walker / Carla Johnson
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allie Wood
+0.048better than expected — took 53% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Ginevra Casa Smith
2026-05-21 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.018about as expected — took 31% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 5-2
L
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Spencer-Snyder
+0.003about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Jolanta Grigsby / Vivian Olson
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hanseler
−0.003below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-03 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.035below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Amanda Weaver / Aki Carroll
2026-03-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Spencer-Snyder
+0.044better than expected — took 60% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Connolly
−0.032below expectation — took 38% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Juliet Wu / MaryAnn O'Connell
2026-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Miller
+0.001about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Catherine Nielsen / Melissa Saelzer
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
−0.019below expectation — took 53% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.