Search

Minda Brusse

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
57 matches · 31W–26L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.73
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
192 of 213
WA · 3.0
834 of 960

Minda is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Minda has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Minda has gone from the 29th to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
56.8%
25W–19L · 48.4% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.6% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history57 matches
L
Gwynne Laurente / Corinne Dubedat
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annelies Smith
0.072below expectation — took 14% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Spencer-Snyder
0.022below expectation — took 8% of games against 30% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Sarah Gardner / Jolene Parisio
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annelies Smith
0.026below expectation — took 48% of games against 60% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Julie Park / Naomi Arnold
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annelies Smith
+0.014better than expected — took 60% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Sasha Tanji / Katherine Xu
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Morris
0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Saddler
+0.020about as expected — took 37% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Sarah Parrilla / Monika Sharma
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caren Gillespie
0.073below expectation — took 14% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caren Gillespie
+0.068better than expected — took 100% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Vanessa Yang / Gogo Chan
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annelies Smith
+0.014better than expected — took 62% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Jill Walzer / Xinbei Gong
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Morris
+0.062better than expected — took 75% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Connolly
0.003below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Catherine Nielsen / Melissa Saelzer
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liesl Langley
0.003about as expected — took 53% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.