Search

Annelies Smith

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
119 matches · 49W–70L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.84
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
46 of 63
WA · 3.0
522 of 755

Annelies is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Annelies has been a steady 3.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Annelies has gone from the 16th to the 54th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
37%
27W–46L · 44.6% of games
6.0
34.8%
8W–15L · 42.8% of games
6.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history119 matches
W
Hanqi Ni / ZIYANG ZHANG
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Louise Bowman
+0.016better than expected — took 55% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Dana Feder / Victoria Chen
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Louise Bowman
0.028below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Xinbei Gong / Jingci Wang
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Louise Bowman
+0.093better than expected — took 80% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Gwynne Laurente / Corinne Dubedat
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
0.074below expectation — took 14% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Sarah Gardner / Jolene Parisio
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
0.024below expectation — took 48% of games against 59% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Julie Park / Naomi Arnold
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
+0.009about as expected — took 60% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Heather Michail / Natalia Kuznetsova
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Morris
+0.033better than expected — took 56% of games against 42% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Vanessa Yang / Gogo Chan
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
+0.013better than expected — took 62% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Ellen Jones / Michelle Warren
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Wilson
0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Alley Krabak
+0.014better than expected — took 52% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Aki Emori / Sherry Yang
2025-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Henn
+0.005about as expected — took 44% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
Paige Jensen / Yalda Daneshfarnia
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Heather Murch
0.008about as expected — took 41% of games against 45% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.