← Search

Annelies Smith

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 50W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Annelies Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
L
2026-08-02 · WSC-Lash · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with DAVID MATYAS mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-01 · Creaky Knees · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Louise Bowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-29 · Creaky Knees · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Louise Bowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · Creaky Knees · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Louise Bowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-21 · Creaky Knees · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Louise Bowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-06 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-17 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-18 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-15 · TCSP-Women of Wham-Eleveld · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Alley Krabak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
37.8%
28W–46L · 44.9% of games
6.0
34.8%
8W–15L · 42.8% of games
6.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
26 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
1 match
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert