Search

Irva Cooper

Poulsbo, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
109 matches · 59W–50L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.82
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
538 of 755

Irva is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Irva has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Irva has gone from the 77th to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
60.4%
32W–21L · 53.6% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
59%
23W–16L · 55.8% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 41.1% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history109 matches
W
Melodie DeMarr / Sophia Cheng
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathrine Wright
+0.052better than expected — took 86% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Jingci Wang / Hanqi Ni
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Martin
0.016below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Neesha Tandon / Jennifer Gettmann
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachael Alnwick
+0.021better than expected — took 68% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
Sara Javid / Suzanne Kalberer
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Martin
0.003about as expected — took 57% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Jenny Ott / Lisa Mihm
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lissa Dashe
0.004about as expected — took 45% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Mihaela Olariu Ureche / Nicole Carrido
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathrine Wright
0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Rainie McLaughlin / Sarah Parrilla
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Lou Upton
0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Chau La / Ingrid Munck
2026-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachael Alnwick
0.001about as expected — took 53% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Sherry Yang / Mihaela Olariu Ureche
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Lou Upton
0.035below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Tatyana Gordon / Teresa Martinez
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Lou Upton
+0.050better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Annelies Smith / Christine Alley Krabak
2025-11-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cristina Mejia
0.014below expectation — took 48% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Bonnie Currey / Susan Louie
2025-11-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Martin
+0.019better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.