← Search

Kathrine Wright

Poulsbo, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
174 matches · 73W–101L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathrine Wright to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history174 matches
L
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Kirsten Nghiem championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-07 · BAIN-Serve it Up · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angie Godfrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · BAIN-Serve it Up · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angie Godfrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · BAIN-Serve it Up · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirsten Nghiem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · BAIN-Whitlock/Fink · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-23 · BAIN-Whitlock/Fink · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irva Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · BAIN-Whitlock/Fink · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · BAIN-Whitlock/Fink · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Gooch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-12 · BAIN-Whitlock/Fink · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · BAIN-Whitlock/Fink · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irva Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-28 · BAIN-Whitlock · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Enns-Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-02-21 · BAIN-Whitlock · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
50.5%
51W–50L · 50.8% of games
3.5
23.7%
9W–29L · 37.9% of games
6.0
50%
8W–8L · 48.2% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.3% of games
6.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
33 matches
#1 Singles
16%
28 matches
#2 Singles
9%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert