Teams

Creaky Knees

2026 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-01vs Summer BreezeWon 10
W#1 DoublesLouise Bowman / Annelies Smith vs Xiaohe Hao / Xian Wang6-1, 7-6
2026-07-29vs Net WorthWon 10
W#1 DoublesLouise Bowman / Annelies Smith vs Hanqi Ni / ZIYANG ZHANG6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-25vs VolleymortLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacey Roehrs / Sarah Bergdahl vs Xiaobei Li / Xiaoyan Wei0-6, 2-6
2026-07-13vs Sorry, Not SorryLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnnelies Smith / Louise Bowman vs Dana Feder / Victoria Chen2-6, 2-6
2026-06-30vs FastSpinLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacey Roehrs / Sarah Bergdahl vs Joyce Fang / Liling Yuan3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesAnnelies Smith / Louise Bowman vs Xinbei Gong / Jingci Wang6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Louise Bowman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Sarah Bergdahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Annelies Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Stacey Roehrs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Louise Bowman + Annelies Smith141151% games−2.5% vs expected
Stacey Roehrs + Annelies Smith0630% games−18.5% vs expected
Stacey Roehrs + Sarah Bergdahl224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Louise Bowman
32W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Sarah Bergdahl
12W–15L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Annelies Smith
50W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Stacey Roehrs
76W–79L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.