← Search

Carrie Morris

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 53W–74L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Carrie Morris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-09-11 · TCSP-Women of Wow-Morris · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sheila Connolly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Connolly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kat Korab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-18 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annelies Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Connolly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · TCSP-Sharks-Bullard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-03-14 · TCSP-Sharks-Tarte · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Dixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-6
W
2026-02-13 · TCSP-Sharks-Tarte · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Dixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-10-04 · TCSP-Women of Wham-Eleveld · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sheila Connolly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-09-21 · TCSP-Women of Wham-Eleveld · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wendy Champagne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-09-13 · TCSP-Women of Wham-Eleveld · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annelies Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
69.4%
25W–11L · 55.2% of games
3.0
32%
24W–51L · 42% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
17 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal