← Search

Carrie Morris

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
126 matches · 53W–73L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.82
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
156 of 213
WA · 3.0
666 of 960

Carrie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Carrie has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Carrie has gone from the 10th to the 27th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
69.4%
25W–11L · 55.2% of games
3.0
32%
24W–51L · 42% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
40%
4W–6L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history126 matches
L
Sarah Smith / Christa Lum
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Connolly
−0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Valeriia Zaychenko / Flavia Storelli
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kat Korab
−0.043below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Sasha Tanji / Katherine Xu
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
−0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Heather Michail / Natalia Kuznetsova
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annelies Smith
+0.029better than expected — took 56% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Katherine Matias / Sheila Loekito
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Connolly
−0.013below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Jill Walzer / Xinbei Gong
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Minda Brusse
+0.062better than expected — took 75% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Amy Wang / Katie van Zyl
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Dixon
+0.009about as expected — took 46% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-6
W
2026-02-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Dixon
−0.018about as expected — took 63% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Louise Radtke / Adawna Windom
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sheila Connolly
+0.046better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-09-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wendy Champagne
−0.022below expectation — took 43% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annelies Smith
−0.021below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Kathy McPherson / Susan Diekema
2025-09-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annelies Smith
−0.001about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.