← Search

Barty Nicholson

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 38W–45L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Barty Nicholson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-09-11 · HBSQ-Classic Hits-Matysik · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathryn Swingle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-09 · HBSQ-Team #1-A-Huff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sanjay Chopra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · HBSQ-Team #1-A-Huff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Gettmann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · HBSQ-Team #1-A-Huff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sanjay Chopra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · HBSQ-Team #1-A-Huff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sanjay Chopra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · HBSQ-String Sirens-Roberts · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Neesha Tandon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-10 · HBSQ-String Sirens-Roberts · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · HBSQ-String Sirens-Roberts · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gayle Burlinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · HBSQ-String Sirens-Roberts · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tara Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-18 · HBSQ-String Sirens-Roberts · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tara Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-07 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-22 · HBSQ-Swing Sisters-Matysik · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
40.9%
18W–26L · 47.5% of games
6.0
59.3%
16W–11L · 49.3% of games
6.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer