Search

Jillayna Campos

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
83 matches · 36W–47L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.72
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
220 of 252
WA · 3.0
954 of 1107

Jillayna is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jillayna has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jillayna has gone from the 6th to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
59.5%
22W–15L · 51.8% of games
3.0
34.8%
8W–15L · 41.4% of games
6.0
25%
2W–6L · 44.3% of games
6.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 38.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Barbano
+0.000better than expected — took 45% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Susan Williams / Carolyn Bardon
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Engrav
0.008below expectation — took 38% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Barty Nicholson / Sanjay Chopramixed
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patrick Garland
+0.000below expectation — took 32% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Takako Chavez / Pamela King
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vicki Cronin
+0.037better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Helen Jiang / Indu Basavaiah
2026-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Lou
+0.030better than expected — took 56% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Mamta Pandey / Dhivya Seetharaman
2026-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vicki Cronin
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mimi Cook
+0.010better than expected — took 61% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
Cara Lewallen / Sara Molina
2026-01-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Engrav
+0.017better than expected — took 48% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Engrav
+0.011about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sallie Ragsdale
+0.018about as expected — took 41% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-10-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Kryman
0.042below expectation — took 0% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-09-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Kryman
0.005about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.