Search

Lisa Vincent

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
117 matches · 48W–69L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.14
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
4%
stay 3.0
96%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 40% stay · 60% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.02. Lower than today’s 3.14 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
18 of 144
WA · 3.0
61 of 755

Lisa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lisa has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Lisa has gone from the 26th to the 64th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
50%
5W–5L · 55% of games
3.0
43.2%
32W–42L · 48.7% of games
6.0mixed
26.9%
7W–19L · 43.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history117 matches
W
Tonya Dressel / Kristin Bedard
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Lusty
+0.014better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Estelle Erhardt / Shweta Omkaram
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Bardon
+0.010about as expected — took 52% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Helen Xie / Amy Trang
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Bardon
+0.054better than expected — took 92% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Warren
+0.022better than expected — took 57% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Connie Elim / Wen Cui
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Jones
+0.011about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Kriss Wells / Ellen Owen
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Bardon
0.034below expectation — took 45% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Bardon
+0.124better than expected — took 100% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Nikki Wildfang / Sarah Gardner
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dawn Spratley
0.018below expectation — took 48% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
Margaret Landry-Navarro / Salome Koloffon Tella
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Lu
+0.019better than expected — took 57% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Teresa Engrav / Jillayna Campos
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Walzer
+0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Lu
+0.022better than expected — took 42% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Reese Cowan Stewart / Tim Kimmixed
2025-11-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matthew Thomas Allen
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.